An assessment of the first section of the 1992 film Essay Example for Free

An assess live forcet of the first section of the 1992 involve renderEnglish Media Coursework An assessment of the first section of the 1992 photo Of Mice and Men, including some comparisons with part one of trick Steinbecks figmentIn section one of the novel Of Mice and Men written by John Steinbeck, begins with a commentary of the pool and its surroundings in do to familiarize us with the check offting, using poetic im come onry to eviscerate the golden foothill slopes of the Salinas river valley and the pool on the bank of which the leaves lie deep and so crisp that a lizard yields a great skittering if he runs among them. Some rabbits sit in the sand. There is a raceway through the willows and among the sycamores leading to the sandy rivers edge. The description conveys an idyllic peace to the scene which is disturbed as the novels ii main characters emerge from the woods. The rabbits scurry into the scrubs and a heron flies from the pool before George and Lennie put down the clearing.George and Lennie ar described as physical opposites, George being small and quick, dark of face, with restless eyes and sharp, unbendable features plot of ground Lennie is described as a huge public, shapeless of face, with large pale eyes, with wide pitch shoulders, and he walked heavily but despite the difference in physical way John Steinbeck stresses the similarities of enclothe Both were groomed in denim. Both wore black, shapeless hats and both carried tight blanket rolls, this suggests that Lennie maybe trying to copy George as he styles up to him and wants to be deal him, as overly imitates George actions at the river bank.In the following pages George and Lennies conversation and behaviour helps the reader learn that the two atomic number 18 migrant ranch workers, on their way to one job to another. They be handout to work on a ranch in Soledad and George makes it clear he is to do all the talking when they arrive George angrily disco vers that Lennie has been concealing a clingen mouse (I could pet it with my thumb while we walked along) This informs the reader that Lennie likes to pet soft things, which is to be carefully remark in light of future (and past) events, George has beans for dinner and when Lennie kidishly sates he likes ketchup with his beans, George gets angry and muses on the keep he could live if he wasnt with Lennie I got you You cant keep a job and you lose me eer job I get. Jus keep me shovin all over the country all the time You do swelled things and I got to get you turn up.Through Georges anger we learn about one of the bad things which occurred at their finale job, in Weed, when Lennie wanted to pet the girls dress because it was pretty and held on when she tried to jerk away. The two had to run the town in the dark as the town people were looking for them, Lennie responds to Georges anger with self-pity and uses a wrong trip, sorrowfully motto that if George doesnt want him around, he could go off and live in the hills by himself. This softens George into saying that he wants Lennie to stay, so we know these threats are not serious and that George does genuinely like Lennie as a friend. Lennie urges George to verbalise about the rabbits, this is when we are first introduced to the dream that George and Lennie share, that they will get their own piece of priming and the money and means by which to live off of it.George describes how he and Lennie are unlike from other ranchers who flub from town to town, who dont belong no place. Lennie and George are different according to George, because they have future and each other. genius day they will have enough money and live off the fatta the land. This arrays the reader that George needs Lennie as a Friend so not to be lonely I got you to look later me, and you got me to look after you this shows the loyalty and friendship which exists surrounded by George and Lennie, and the dream of a better life. A ll though George does execute angry with Lennie resulting in some tension during this section of the novel, the atmosphere at the end is real tranquil and pleasant leavening the reader to disembodied spirit positive and felicitous this is the equal in both the film and the novel.The 1992 film version Of Mice and Men opens with white on black credits which are simple and deliver out clearly. Gradually sound set up of a wagon/train are added and lighting effects are faded in slowly to show the inside of an old fashioned goods wagon. There is also affirmground music which is in truth atmospheric, building tension. This is followed by a slow fade and a mean up shot of a mans face, which we later come to realize is George, played by Gary Sinise who is also the director.George pensively, unhappily sits alone in a railway car, the shadows of the cars slats partially covering his face. At the end of the film the alike(p) shot is repeated, therefore the earreach realise the fil m is in fact a flash back from Georges memory, The gentle and eerie background music and use of dark, gloomy colours convey a mavin of arcanum adding interest which makes the audience want to watch on to externalize whats going to happen they also illustrate a mood of sadness along with the miserable expression stressed in the death up shot of Gary Sinises face.At the start of the narrative in the film, the television tv camera jumps to a sequence of a woman in a vivid red dress, running though fields apparently in desperate escape of some undefined terror, She runs towards the camera, As she gets terminalr to the camera the audience can picks out details in which give clues about the woman such as the tear in her dress and her panicky face which is stressed in a close up shot but the mystery is continued when she runs past the camera and out of the audiences sight. The sound effects of the womans gasped breath are precise frantic, adding compass point of play and tension to grab the audiences intention and the red of her dress stands out clearly in contrast to the young fields.The director immediately makes the camera jump to a sequence showing two men, being tag by a group of men on horses armed with rifles and led by hunting dogs. The camera follows this chase, panning along to show the men running though long grass. The camera angle then changes to show the chase from the point of assure of the men who are being chased, showing the dogs and men running towards the camera which makes the audience feel as if they are being chased and allowing them to tell things from the mens point of view. Water from the horses splashes on the camera, showing the audience how close they are, adding tension and making the audience feel more involved, helping them to feel how the men are feeling by showing things from the mens point of view.The two men jump into an irrigation ditch. The man from the start of the film jumps in first, front view and then the other m an jumps in after but from a side view.The camera is used as one of the mens view, to the audience it helps them to feel how the men are feeling. It creates confusion because at first the audience may not know whose view it is and what they are looking at, since the men are in hiding and the viewer can visualize the weeds overhanging in front of them this also creates suspense as the audience can see the two mens point of view of the situation. The opening film sequence has a very dramatic and tense start in browse to grab the audiences intention, making them want to watch on. In comparison to the novel Of Mice and Men which is very different as it opens with a nonviolent, happy and serene scene, making the reader build up hope and creating a joyful atmosphere.The camera jumps from the irrigation ditch to the two men (George and Lennie) hitching a freight train at night in order to escape. Another jump follows to a studio location of a 1930s Californian town (Salinas) this scene is added to show the audience the time in which the film is set in and grownup them an idea of George and Lennies surrounds and their way of life. While they are in the town Lennie asks George were they are going George said were going to a ranch to work this dialog has been added to inform the audience of were they are going and of there trustworthy situation. George and Lennie take a bus to the ranch but they are dropped off in the countryside a some miles from the ranch.The serene and tranquil scene was probably set on location. The dialog they use is almost the same as the book, the camera pans along while they walk and talk setting them both in coordinate system emphasizing that they have a close relationship. As the bus goes by George and Lennie, George realises that they have been dropped off in the wrong place and yells out son of a bitch to the bus driver, Lennie copies George and also yells son of a bitch this is improvisation as it is not in the book, it has been adde d to show how Lennie copies George and what he does suggesting that he looks up to him and wants to be like him, showing the audience a bit about his character. Lennies (played by John Malkovitch )voice is very child like, portraying Lennie like a child trapped in a mans body, which makes sense but at times also seem over the top as in the book I felt that Lennie was just very simple minded, but in the film Lennie seems to be seriously retarded.While George and Lennie are sitting by the pool Lennie decides to drink from the pool then spit the water out of his embouchure in a child like fashion, again this is improvisation to show how child like Lennie is, George reacts to this by laughing at him showing he is used to Lennie and his childish behaviour almost to like how a parent would laugh at a child. The camera uses close up shots of Lennies face in order to emphases his odd facial expressions and medium close-ups to show George and Lennies body language especially Lennie who ten ds to use various shadowy hand jesters in order to help express himself which he cant do very well.During George and Lennies demarcation about ketchup the camera is shot in separate frames to show they are now separate, because they are angry. The camera also uses medium close ups of George and Lennie while George is kneeling and Lennie is standing up to show how such(prenominal) bigger Lennie is compared to George and their differences in physical appearance, it also shows that Lennie could be seen as a treat to George. The camera tilts up when showing Lennie to make him seem taller and he probably has used padding in his clothes to make him appear bigger, while when the camera is on George it tends to tilt down to make him appear smaller.During the argument George doesnt reboot the girl in the red dress which he does in the novel, he just said you do bad things, he doesnt mention it because he doesnt need to explain this to the audience as the girl in the film as this has alre ady been shown at the start unlike the novel. The argument shows the audience that George and Lennie do fall out sometimes. When the augment is over Lennie uses a guilt trip on George, the guilt is empathised in close up of Georges face.The camera jumps to George and Lennie sitting by a camp fire, this is the last sequence of this section of the film. It is set outside in the dark but the lighting effects make it light enough to see whats happening, the light from the fire reflects on there faces in order to emphasis them there are many an(prenominal) off screen natural sound effects such as cricket noises and other types of bugs and birds. Lennie asks George to tell him about the dream and as George begins to tell the dream background music gradually comes in which is very soft and genital to create an dream like atmosphere.The camera puts both George and Lennie in the frame while telling the dream maybe to show that they both share this dream and to show the friendship between th em. When George stops telling the dream he saids oh the hell with it at this point the background music absolutely stops showing that they have come out of the dream and are now back to reality. At the end they are both in frame, lying by the camp fire, the atmosphere is quite and peaceful with the natural sound effects of bugs est. off screen in the background leaving the audiences feeling happy and positive.Overall, I thought the first section of the Of Mice and Men film was good and very well through with(p) by Gary Sinise. In the movie you can actually see and hear things that you probably would not watch out on to in the book. For example there are the facial expressions of George and Lennie. The music soundtrack to the film Of Mice and Men is very well composed I especially liked how the music is classical, which is very appealing to all age groups and genders. The music was important as it set the mood for the scene the audience was seeing. The landscaping and camera work was also very good. The setting of the pool was just as it was described in the book.Also, the clothing irresolute by Lennie and George fitted the time frame allowing the audience to feel that they are back in that time period by watching, and also showed that they were not well off. In many ways the first section of the film is similar to the novel such as the dialog they use is almost identical to the novel and the appearance of the characters in the film are almost exactly like how they are described in the novel, Lennie is very big and bulky, while George is small with a tanned face. The director changed the order of the story at the origin by starting with the girl in the red dress, this was probably changed in order to grab the audience intension at the beginning of the film so then they would want to watch on to see whats happening.Right from the start of the movie you can see that Lennie has a mental illness, and George is taking care of him like a father the same as it is with the novel. Also, you can tell that George gets impatient with Lennie numerous times and that he gets frustrated very easily. I thought the fibre of George was played very well by Gary Sinise who seems to draw out the role of George perfectly as he coveys Georges caring side as well. As for Lennie this role is probably more of a challenge as he is difficult to convey without sounding cartoonish, John Malkovich didnt work wonders for the role as he used such a silly voice, though if he had used a normal way of speaking the audience would probably find it difficult to see him as mentally handy capped.